Skip to content
CalmReport

Venezuela Could Now Determine Trump's Legacy - as well as the United States' Position in the Global Order

In the wake of executing a evening of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the state-building arena.

In a striking media briefing at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief declared that US forces had effectively apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then said that a delegation including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be seizing the reins of the beleaguered nation.

"We are going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, orderly and careful transition," he said.

What exactly "running the country" actually means is ambiguous, but the vow represents an abrupt shift in direction for the president, full of contradictions and daunting obstacles.

A leader who campaigned against "endless conflicts", who vehemently denounced past US efforts at regime change and who vowed to implement an "America first" international policy is now gambling his presidency on successfully revitalizing a South American nation whose economy is in shambles and whose political stability has been undermined by decades of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was persistently confident.

He stated his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He promised to enlist American oil firms to overhaul Venezuela's crumbling production infrastructure, supplying capital for the American rebuilding project and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He declined to rule out sending American soldiers to Venezuela to further these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to consider the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you shatter it, you are responsible for it."

A Changed Global Approach

The US has reshaped Venezuela's future – for better or worse.

Trump came to power nearly a year ago pledging to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has shown that he is quite prepared to use armed force around the globe.

In the past week, he ordered airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted nuclear facilities in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, militias in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Unlike previous operations, which have largely involved rockets and warplanes that reduce the exposure of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his pledges to the future of that nation – are strikingly different.

His objective, he said during his briefing, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Domestic and International Reaction

That play on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - slogan may be difficult for some of Trump's followers to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump ally who broke with the president after charging him of abandoning his political base, was swift to condemn the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's perpetual use of force and support of overseas conflicts is justified because we are compelled to pay for it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another prominent Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on arms and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and halt fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers rallied behind the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the armed intervention against a "illegitimate government" as "decisive and justified".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his press conference, the president argued the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" priorities because it guaranteed US hemispheric security and provided a steady source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American foreign policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Trump Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will never be challenged again."

The goal of the new US security policy, he said, was to "safeguard commerce, land and resources that are fundamental to our security interests." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's choice to capture Maduro will provoke larger concerns in international relations, however, and affect American relations with the world's other major global powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement expressing surprise and condemning what it said was a irresponsible assault on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered comparable condemnations of Russia following its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to broker a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, voiced worry about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My main concern is now Russia will use this to justify their illegal and brutal operations against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"America should not be administering other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in endless wars and overthrow attempts that carry devastating results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a criminal and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he condemned Trump's decision not to consult with legislative leaders before initiating the attack.

"The President has the legal duty to follow the law and protect institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First demands."

Trump, in his remarks, explained that he chose not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "leak" details of the operation before the attack.

An Uncertain Future

That mission was a success – with no American casualties and minimal damage to US equipment. Trump, with his characteristic bravado, described the operation as a "daring raid" and "among the most stunning, effective and impressive demonstrations of American power and competency in US history."

Now he is gambling his presidency on that success enduring, as the US says it will take over running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that actually means is unknown. He and his team must fortify a nation that has been in turmoil for decades while stabilising a region that is bound to be wary of what Trump's foreign policy has planned for them.

By

Adam Rogers

Elara is a seasoned journalist with over a decade of experience in investigative reporting and media analysis, dedicated to fostering informed public discourse.

CalmReport

Type to search articles.